<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?>
<rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:wfw="http://wellformedweb.org/CommentAPI/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
	xmlns:slash="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/slash/"
	>

<channel>
	<title>Tewksbury Lab &#187; doing science</title>
	<atom:link href="http://tewksburylab.org/blog/category/doing-science/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://tewksburylab.org</link>
	<description>Natural History to Global Ecology</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Wed, 13 Feb 2013 11:20:00 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<language>en-US</language>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.5.1</generator>
		<item>
		<title>Collected Wisdom on Job Talks – Delivering a Truly Great Research Seminar</title>
		<link>http://tewksburylab.org/blog/2012/09/collected-wisdom-on-job-talks-delivering-a-truly-great-research-seminar/</link>
		<comments>http://tewksburylab.org/blog/2012/09/collected-wisdom-on-job-talks-delivering-a-truly-great-research-seminar/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Fri, 21 Sep 2012 18:15:23 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Tewksbury</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Collected Wisdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doing science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tewksburylab.org/?p=1279</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the third installment of the Collected Wisdom on Job Talks series I have been posting. The first installment is an introduction, and it introduces some key over-arching themes, the second installment focuses on content and preparation. If you are just tuning in, its probably best to start at the first installment and work [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1280" title="carl" src="http://tewksburylab.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/12/carl.jpg" alt="" />This is the third installment of the Collected Wisdom on Job Talks series I have been posting. <a href="http://faculty.washington.edu/tewksjj/blog/2012/09/the-art-of-the-job-talk-how-to-build-and-deliver-a-truly-great-research-seminar/">The first installment</a> is an introduction, and it introduces some key over-arching themes, the <a href="http://faculty.washington.edu/tewksjj/blog/2012/09/the-job-talk-part-1-nine-commandments-for-building-a-truly-great-research-seminar/">second installment</a> focuses on content and preparation. If you are just tuning in, its probably best to start at the first installment and work forward, but in case you have forgotten, this series is called Collected Wisdom because these ideas were put together by soliciting feedback from a wide range of faculty in academic institutions. The majority of folks who participated were professors in ecology, evolutionary biology, or conservation, but I had folks joining in from across the biological sciences. The result is a mash-up of ideas which I organized into major themes. This set of tips focuses on the art of delivery – ho to make the most of all the preparation you have put into a talk. As always, if you want to add to this list, please leave a comment.</p>
<p><strong>1) Stay on Time</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Stay on time, and under the full amount of time allotted, and make sure to allow time for questions (if it’s a 50 min time slot, aim for 40, so you can treat the seminar as a time for a collegial exchange of ideas rather than just a show about yourself. It shows both confidence and openness.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>2) Slow down</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Speaking faster to say more does not improve a talk. Give yourself time to make points clearly and for the audience to think while you are talking. Leave the slide you are talking about up until you have finished making any points about it. Don’t use notes. At all. This is a Job talk.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>3) Connect with individuals</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Care about your audience. Respect and pay attention to those in front of you. Engage them. You have to do this at two time scales at least. First, get to know your audience before giving the talk and prepare a suitable one. It is deadly to give a seminar full of ecological/neuroscience/molecular jargon to a general biology department (or worse, to a general lay audience). It is also bad to give too general a talk to a specialized audience. Second pay attention to your audience while delivering the talk. Are they engaged? Is it time to do something vaguely outrageous to bring them back into the fold? If done well, it is very effective to engage the audience at a personal level. There are all sorts of ways of doing this. For example, involve someone in the audience as an element of the talk. “Josh, what do you think? Does this graph make sense?” Especially if you’re on a job talk and you’ve had a chance to meet and talk with folks before your seminar – include points raised in those conversations in a causal way, and name them without being overly pandering. connect to your audience. You can also ask the audience questions “Have you all watched the director’s cut of Bladerunner?” (That will get their attention). Make frequent eye contact to see if you are keeping the audience with you. There will always be someone snoozing, so do not freak out, but make an effort to keep them with you.</li>
<li>No matter how many people are in the audience, talk to them as if you are in the hallway with a single colleague and are in a conversation.  Positive, intense, focused.   LOOK at people – stare straight at them as you make your points.  Connect!  get out from behind the lectern/podium and move towards the audience.  people will stay awake, and stay involved if you are looking/talking directly at/to them.  This means be prepared and bring your own equipment (see #11).</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>4) Consider the power of the spoken word, and the power of silence</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Channel David Attenborough, Oprah, and Carl Sagan. Don’t rush. Emphasize individual words/points. Use silence to allow a visual point, or a spoken point, to sink in. Allow yourself to use a broader vocabulary than is customary in science. Cement your messages with metaphor.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>5) Body Language</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Body language matters – Your physicality should portray confidence and excitement. Staying grounded with both feet on the floor, using good posture, and making gestures that are open and relaxed can communicate this. As an audience member there is nothing worse than feeling nervous for the speaker because they look nervous themselves.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>6) Vary your pace, vary your voice and convey excitement</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>You’re not ‘giving a seminar’, you’re not nervous. You’re just talking science with some colleagues, and there’s nothing else you’d rather be doing.</li>
<li>Let your voice communicate your excitement about your science. If you don’t care, why should I?</li>
<li>Vary from detail to generalization. After a dense part, say something lighter…after a few graphs, have a colored picture of your preparation or of a model or of anatomy… Try to make it fun as well as interesting. Eventually public speaking will be a pleasure for you as well because one can enjoy communicating technical ideas in a clear and effective manner. Your enjoyment will be evident and will help audience enjoyment. And practice a punchy last sentence or two so you don’t end with, “Well I guess that’s all I have to say.”</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>7) Recognize that many people do not hear as well as you</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>A significant number of older people hear poorly, and many speakers’ voices tend to disappear toward the end of sentences. They have a nice strong voice, but in mid sentence it goes into a gravely lower register and fades as perhaps they are running out of breath. The sentence ends like a casual parenthetical whisper that can’t be heard. Try to catch yourself doing that and develop a more consistent audible tone to the end of the sentence. Keep your voice up all the way through. Pause and take a breath instead of squeezing more out.</li>
<li>Many people in your audience will not be native English speakers. Try to use simple, widely understood words, allusions, and humor rather than local idioms, however trendy. Talks have an implied formality. Consider that you are on show and are the leader of an intellectual experience.</li>
<li>Your talk is accessible only if it can be heard and understood.  In each room, try to estimate how loudly you need to speak to reach the back row.  If you are not confident of being heard, use the microphone when available.  The microphone helps only if you remain near it and speak towards it.  Experiment a bit before the talk starts.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>8) Don’t apologize or complain; make statements, and work with your slides</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Avoid being self-deprecating. Don’t put yourself down (saying things like “I know this pattern isn’t strong but…” or using too many caveats like “This may mean”). Be confident (without being annoyingly cocky). <span style="text-decoration: underline;">Never apologize for anything in a job talk</span>.</li>
<li>Try very hard to make statements about what you see rather than say them as questions (because your voice goes up at the end of a question, reducing its impact).</li>
<li>Do not try to impress how much you did or how hard it was– try instead to communicate the really cool science and ideas.</li>
<li>Explain all things on all slides — never say that we should ignore things (that just means you were too lazy to pull them out)</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>9) Start and end strong</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Consider starting, or ending, your talk extemporaneously with the lights up. Force the audience to look at you, and to follow your words. It takes a bit of guts, but it also connects the audience to you, instead of to your images.</li>
<li>Know your introduction cold. If you mumble through the first few minutes, you’re toast. When you begin, start at a place that will peak the curiosity of the whole room. When I begin my talks about the evolution of spice in chilies, for example, I often start with<br />
<blockquote><p>“In 1928, Alin Milne, creator of Winnie the Pooh, took a look at plants, and the animals that eat them, and said “All the good foods that an animal likes have the wrong sort of swallow and too many spikes.” Roughly translated; plants go to great lengths to defend their valuable resources from unwanted consumption. …”</p></blockquote>
<p>By starting far from the center of your story, and in a somewhat whimsical place that most of the audience knows well from their childhood, I can catch the audience off guard, wake them up, and give them a reason to expect something a little different. There are many ways to do this, and the “best” way depends on your speaking style, and your topic.</li>
<li>The same advice goes for your conclusion. Know it cold. It is often best to end on a serious note, to leave the audience with the key questions and conclusions, and the conclusion is a great place to use metaphor in a talk – it sticks better in people’s minds. However you do it, you should also be able to end your seminar gracefully. ’That’s all folks’ is great for Bugs Bunny, but not for a seminar.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>10) In the question and answer session</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Don’t interrupt questioners.</li>
<li>For aggressive questions, always answer the substance, never answer the tone.</li>
<li>Don’t make your answer to a question too long.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>11) Make peace with the pointer(s) – point it, don’t circle or draw with it.</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Use the pointer to indicate the data you are describing. Move it slowly to guide movement of the eyes to exactly what you are now talking about.</li>
<li>Don’t wave it rapidly or in circles to call attention to an area. The observer gets dizzy and can’t see through all the visual interference you are creating. I just close my eyes when that happens. Point and hold.</li>
<li>Always bring your own pointer to a job talk</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>12) Always prepare for the unexpected</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Try your talk on different platforms (PC, Mac) and projectors. Prepare for something to fail (e.g., an embedded movie). Bring a backup of your talk on a flash drive, and put a copy on the web where you can retrieve it anywhere that there’s web access. Shit happens.</li>
<li>Bring a second laser pointer to every talk. Laser pointer batteries run down often in a lecture. The batteries have very little capacity. You can see the pointer light better than the audience. If the light starts looking dim to you, the audience will not see it; switch to an old fashioned stick or pull out your other pointer.</li>
<li>Bring your own USB remote, so you can walk around the room.</li>
<li>Assume your computer will die en-route, so always carry backups (jump drive, CD) of your presentation and have a copy on the web that you can access from anywhere, if needed.</li>
<li>Check your images on a data-projector, not just on your computer. Data projectors often alter colors and brightness.</li>
<li>If you have multimedia (sound, video), check, practice, verify, have alternate solutions. Even if problems that arise are not your fault, some will see them as your fault. If problems do arise (with any part of your talk) never apologize. Just move on. Never point out misspellings that you suddenly see during your presentation. Stiff upper lip. Fix the error immediately afterwards.</li>
<li>Show up early to test your setup. Remind your host about knowing how to access technical help, in the event of a glitch.</li>
<li>If you are going to a meeting and need to upload your presentation onto a session computer, check for Mac-PC incompatibility, preferably before you go. Have a .pdf version as a backup — that should work on any computer, but you’ll lose any animations.</li>
</ul>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tewksburylab.org/blog/2012/09/collected-wisdom-on-job-talks-delivering-a-truly-great-research-seminar/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>89</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Collected Wisdom on Job Talks – Building a Truly Great Research Seminar (UPDATED)</title>
		<link>http://tewksburylab.org/blog/2012/09/collected-wisdom-on-job-talks-building-a-truly-great-research-seminar-updated/</link>
		<comments>http://tewksburylab.org/blog/2012/09/collected-wisdom-on-job-talks-building-a-truly-great-research-seminar-updated/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Thu, 06 Sep 2012 18:20:34 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Darin Reid</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Collected Wisdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doing science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tewksburylab.org/?p=1286</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[This is the second installment in the Collected Wisdom on Job Talks series. The first 1) Provide a narrative: the art of clarity and mystery Start big – Good talks begin with a topic that everyone in the audience can understand and relate to. The goal of the first few slides should be to capture [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1297" title="dee" src="http://tewksburylab.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/dee.jpg" alt="" />This is the second installment in the Collected Wisdom on Job Talks series. The first</p>
<p><strong>1) Provide a narrative: the art of clarity and mystery</strong></p>
<p>Start big – Good talks begin with a topic that everyone in the audience can understand and relate to. The goal of the first few slides should be to capture the audience’s imagination and make them feel invested in the story you are about to tell. In other words, create common ground before diving in.</p>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<ul>
<li>Care about story telling and narrative structure. The best seminars are good stories and like all good narratives they have an interesting and engaging plot. They keep the listener at the edge of their seat. The art of a good narrative is to combine predictability and surprise. Tell your audience what the story will be about (this is what “organizing slides” are about) but have a plot with surprises and interesting turns. The art of a good narrative comes from either being an innately good story-teller, or from reading good fiction (Poe, Hemingway, some of the good pulp and mystery writers such as Elmore Leonard are great models). It does not hurt to make an outline of your plot rather than just putting a bunch of slides together. Posing mysteries/questions is a ploy that can be used to great dramatic effect.</li>
<li>Use a story-telling technique other than chronological – “first I did this, then I did this, then I did that” is, well, boring. Extra points for creating a suspenseful story. Two story-lines that work really well:
<ul>
<li>2×4 from the left – leading your audience in one direction, with the implicit expectation of a certain result or outcome, dashing their expectations (the 2×4), using that research “disaster” to realize some greater pattern, outcome or underlying fundamental truth (this structure works well for a series of experiments with early “failures” leading to a divergent path and final success)</li>
<li>Baptist preacher – start high, bring low, end high. Works really well for conservation talks where the end message mixes scientific outcomes with a larger social/societal message of interaction/responsibility/ etc.</li>
<li>Science is a detective story. Tell it like one. State hypotheses explicitly, with at least two strong, plausible alternatives so that nobody can figure out in advance what your results will be. Highlight the unexpected and the counterintuitive results. Play up any clever insights that let you solve the problem, or any exceptionally large datasets and analytical savvy that let you do what nobody else has been able to do before. Science is (or at least should be) a CREATIVE enterprise, not just a slog.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>2) Provide context and structure</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Care about didactics. When you give a lecture you are both an entertainer and a teacher. Audience members should go out knowing something new and having learned how to explain it in a couple of pithy sentences. The best talks are those in which people leave saying “I didn’t know that! Man, feather lice are so cool!” Do not be embarrassed about giving all the background/context needed for the talk to be understood and for its importance to be appreciated. What is obvious to you might not be to the rest of the audience. Ecologists will welcome a refresher on how G proteins work and physiologists will thank you if you explain how the neutral theory works and why it matters.</li>
<li>Why is your research important to science? What are the big questions you’re addressing? Why is your system BY FAR the best way to get at these questions? Context and relevance are EVERYTHING for the majority of the audience.</li>
<li>Have waypoints with clear summaries — building to a grand conclusions</li>
<li>Create an interesting storyline and communicate the organizational structure that goes along with this storyline to the audience. Good talks let the audience know where they are headed and check in with them along the way to keep them posted on where they are at in the storyline.</li>
<li>Start with saying what you are going to say. It could be an outline of the talk or even some of the major conclusions right up front. People want to know within less than 5 min what the point is going to be and whether they are in the right lecture. Only after this brief statement, begin an introduction of the general area of this work and why it is interesting. After an introduction, you have your observations, and towards the end, summarize all over again. Include broader implications. Don’t forget this last section on implications, else people may go away wondering, “so what?”</li>
<li>Have a clear overarching question that you start with, flesh out, and return to (i.e. say what you will say, say it, remind people what you said). The bricks are the excellent results and data you have garnered, but without the mortar, no one will understand their significance. Outlines, schematics with parts highlighted, etc, are great for this.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>3) Keep it simple</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Have a good conceptual framework explaining what you like in Biology (or whatever field…). Usually only a small fraction of the audience will really get the details of what you do. They need to hear and see (with a schematic) what the big picture is. This is usually three topics, like “behavior, physiology, and environment” or “modeling, field observations, and manipulations”. It really can be anything…but often this is the ONLY thing that the majority of the audience will take away about the candidate. It gives people an idea of what you would do for 30 years, and how you would fit into that department.</li>
<li>Keep the main points simple – People probably only remember 1-3 things from your talk. Make sure that you decide which 1-3 things are the most important and that your entire talk revolves around them. Remind your audience of those main points at the end of your talk as well.</li>
<li>Bad seminars frequently try to pack far too much into the time slot. My gut tells me that you can hit only 2-3 pieces of the big picture story in any seminar.</li>
<li>In any talk you will have some goal–a few points to make. Organize the talk to maximize the clarity of these points. Throughout focus on items that lead you to these specific goals and reject tempting tidbits that don’t aid in getting there.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>4) Care deeply about representation: from graphics, to art to font</strong></p>
<ul>
<li> Slides must be clear but in great seminars they are beautiful. Spending time making beautiful images that are didactical and clear separates the good/competent talks from the excellent ones. What we do, the creatures and systems that we study, are so damn beautiful that there is no justification for esthetically sterile talks.</li>
<li>Use an artist’s eye when making your slides – Use a combination of background and text colors that contrast with each other but do not make your eyes strain. Try to place objects on a page so that they are evenly spaced and “look nice”. In some cases using a photographer’s ”rule of thirds” can make slides look very professional. I like to outline all of my photographs and figures with a thin border so that the images look crisp. There are lots of ways to make your slides enjoyable for an audience to look at. I have gotten many comments on this over the years and it can make a real difference in keeping an audience’s attention.</li>
<li>No slides where ANYTHING is unreadable or hard to interpret. How many times have you heard a slide introduced like this: ”I know you can’t read this in the back of the room, but …” ”These colors didn’t show up as well as I thought, but …” ”&#8221;This is a very busy figure so I’ll walk you through it …” ”I know this slide is a little dark, but trust me — this little smudge is really important …” ”There are no labels on these axes, but they are …” IF YOU HAVE TO APOLOGIZE FOR A SLIDE IT IS NOT WORTH SHOWING.</li>
<li>Clear and beautiful figures that are clearly explained. What is the x-axis? What is the y axis? What pattern (trend line, colors, differences, no relationship, etc) do you want people to see in the figure? Only after explaining all that will people really understand the significance (which you should also tell them).</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>5) Cut text, then cut more text, then remove even more text.</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>No text-only slides. EVER. Images should be compelling, clear, and large enough for the old timers in the audience.</li>
<li>Use PowerPoint as an image projector, not a presentation crutch. That means minimal text, rarely if ever in bullet point form, always large font.</li>
<li>Use as few words as possible. Avoid long lists of anything. People can’t retain them. If you have to say, “I know you can’t read this but….,” you have too much material on your slide.</li>
<li>Make sure that you’ll talk about everything on each slide. Otherwise, remove unneeded figures or panels.</li>
<li>Minimize text on slides – put only enough text on the slide to remind yourself of what you need to say, or very very strategically to remind the audience of some key concept or number that they need to remember as the story rolls out<a href="#_ftn1">[1]</a>. And if you can remind yourself what you need to say with just a photograph or a graph, even better. This produces a more professional slide set that seems a little more ‘mature’, and it draw the audience into the speaker’s story rather than reading slides.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>6) Know and care about your audience</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Know your audience. The first 10 minutes and last 10 minutes (at least) must be accessible to EVERYONE in the audience. I have never, EVER heard anyone complain that a speaker spent too much time on introducing the subject and putting it in context.</li>
<li>Know your audience. A seminar to a biology department is different than a seminar to a cell biology or ecology/evolution department.</li>
<li>Know the audience. It’s crucial to gauge the level appropriately. If you know key people in the field will be in the audience, make sure that you cite their work appropriately, but not gratuitously. Also, don’t confuse appealing to a broad audience with “dumbing down” – colleagues (including undergraduates through senior faculty) from other disciplines or sub-disciplines are not stupid, even if they aren’t up on the latest bayesian technique,</li>
<li>For the job seminar, talk briefly in a very genuine way about your fit to the department. This is not an idle shout out to all the professors you might have something in common with. Instead, this takes researching the departmental resources and understanding how you could both use and contribute to them.</li>
<li>For the job seminar, use the last 5-10 min. to talk about what you would do in your new lab. This could even have potential specific aims for a grant. Consider what experiments your first rotation or grad student or undergrad(s) would do in the lab.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>7) Be clear about YOUR research</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>Be very clear what YOU, PERSONALLY have contributed to the science. Own the work. Don’t say “I’m a postdoc in the xx lab and we study….”. This is especially important if you’re coming out of a big lab. Some tips:
<ul>
<li>Use your acknowledgements well. Be classy, complete, and quick. This is one of the only times in your seminar when you will put text and information on a slide that you will not talk about. List funding, list advisors and lab-mates, list collaborators. Don’t call them all out by name.</li>
<li>List published works under relevant results, so folks know what is published.</li>
</ul>
</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>8) Reduce the number of slides and the number of transitions</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>The exact number depends a lot on how you use them, but you will almost always have too many</li>
<li>Up to 35 slides for a 45-minute talk might be possible. More than that, especially if many have data, is just overload. For a 15 min talk, 10 slides seems the upper limit. You may be able to get through more, but the audience will not. You want them to come away satisfied rather than frustrated. Boil down the message to the essentials.</li>
<li>Avoid data diarrhea: Sometimes your story has lots of data you are very proud of. One approach is to show the audience how you carefully analyze one or two points using the raw data. Do this until the audience recognizes that you think well and trusts that you are satisfying rigorous criteria. Then say that you investigated the five other points with similar methods, care, and scrutiny, but since there isn’t time to show each of the individual experiments, you will just be stating the results. This way, you have illustrated how to do it well with details and yet not dragged the audience through too many details.</li>
<li>Keep slides simple – Do not use a lot of words and do use large and simple photos and figures. I try to make a single figure take-up the whole slide so that it is easily visible and I can talk through the key points rather than list them with words. Similarly, I use photographs on slides while going over discussion points rather than listing them as bullets.</li>
</ul>
<p><strong>9) The E’s of life, in 15-minute packets, and with clarity</strong></p>
<ul>
<li>The art of giving a great talk boils down to 4E: Empathy, Ethics, Esthetics, and Etiquette</li>
<li>Any talk over 15 minutes is longer than our brain’s attention span, so break up your talk into 15 minute pieces and then pause for a minute of so between each one so that people can rest.</li>
<li>Don’t try to show your disciplinary colleagues how well you speak the jargon and stop trying to “out-math” them – live in fear of a resurgence of buzzword bingo, and strive to make your work understandable and relevant to the broadest audience</li>
</ul>
<p>&nbsp;</p>
<hr />
<p><a id="#_ftn1">[1]</a> Beware: This latter use of text is where speakers go horribly wrong, thinking the audience needs to remember dozens of full sentences and big bulleted lists.</p>
<p><strong>UPDATE: 10) Give the audience some meat</strong></p>
<p>Jeremy Fox added this important point: When thinking about the scope of your talk, don’t be too superficial. Yes, you need to give the audience the big picture of your science rather than just narrowly focusing on one specific project. But you also need to “give the audience some meat” (as Jeremy’s colleague once put it). You shouldn’t just skim over too many projects, that doesn’t allow your audience to appreciate and evaluate your science. Rough rule of thumb: go into at least some depth on 2-3 projects or lines of research.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tewksburylab.org/blog/2012/09/collected-wisdom-on-job-talks-building-a-truly-great-research-seminar-updated/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>36</slash:comments>
		</item>
		<item>
		<title>Collected Wisdom on Job Talks – Introduction</title>
		<link>http://tewksburylab.org/blog/2012/09/collected-wisdom-on-job-talks-introduction/</link>
		<comments>http://tewksburylab.org/blog/2012/09/collected-wisdom-on-job-talks-introduction/#comments</comments>
		<pubDate>Tue, 04 Sep 2012 18:30:28 +0000</pubDate>
		<dc:creator>Joshua Tewksbury</dc:creator>
				<category><![CDATA[Collected Wisdom]]></category>
		<category><![CDATA[doing science]]></category>

		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://tewksburylab.org/?p=1300</guid>
		<description><![CDATA[You spend years building a CV good enough to get yourself an interview at a major academic institution. Once you get the interview, its time to put the CV away and focus on the seminar. Its just you, the group you are attempting to impress, and the other finalist for the same job. Everyone in [...]]]></description>
				<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p><img class="alignleft size-full wp-image-1302" title="tom" src="http://tewksburylab.org/wp-content/uploads/2012/09/tom.jpg" alt="" />You spend years building a CV good enough to get yourself an interview at a major academic institution. Once you get the interview, its time to put the CV away and focus on the seminar. Its just you, the group you are attempting to impress, and the other finalist for the same job. Everyone in the final pool has a great CV; now it’s about how well you communicate, how well you connect, how well you tell a story. In the interview stage, there is simply no other element that is more important than the seminar. Yes you can loose a job outside of your seminar, but it is extremely difficult to land a job at a competitive academic institution without delivering a truly remarkable seminar. Learning how to give a great seminar is so important to folks entering the job market that I recently ran a graduate seminar focused on just this – the art of the research presentation: how to build and deliver your best possible job talk.</p>
<p>I appreciate a good job talk as much as anyone (and I am probably more likely than most to fall asleep during a mediocre talk), and I have developed some rules for giving my best talk, but I wanted a bigger sounding board. So I contacted a large group of faculty inside and outside of my home institution, and asked them what they thought it takes to create and deliver a truly over the top seminar. Most of the folks who contributed were from R1 institutions, and the majority were professors in ecology, evolutionary biology, and physiology, but consistent advice came from colleagues in a wide range of fields. <em>Some of the key contributors to what follows include Carlos Martinez del Rio, Julia Parrish, Stephanie Hampton, Doug Levey, Lars Brudvig, Ellen Damschen, Carl Bergstrom, Toby Bradshaw, Ray Huey, Billie Swalla, Janneke Hille Ris Lambers, Emily Carrington, Bill Moody, David Perkel, Richard Strathmann, and Robert Cleland</em>. I have organized this advice into main themes and removed some of the redundancies, and done some light editing, but that is about it!</p>
<p>Lets start with three big points that everyone agreed on.</p>
<p><strong>First point: every talk is a job talk.</strong> Unless you never see yourself moving, then every time you talk about your work, you are giving a talk that could lead you to the next job. Job opportunities are often lost without the speaker even knowing it, and this is increasingly the case with informal “seminar-search practices, in which prospects are invited to “give a seminar”.</p>
<p><strong>Second point: there is not one right way to give a research seminar.</strong> The right approach depends on who you are, and who you are speaking to. The double bottom line: feel confident and comfortable with who you are, and know your audience.</p>
<p><strong>Third point: You learn to give a great seminar the same way you get to Carnegie Hall — practice, practice, practice.</strong> Get critical, constructive feedback on several iterations of your talk before any high-stakes event. A good rule of thumb for any high stakes talk – give yourself a minimum of 40 hours of work time to build the talk and hone it to perfection. The difference between a competent talk and an exceptional talk is that last 20 hours of practice AFTER you think the talk is “in good shape”. Talks can seem 95% done when the slides have been finalized, but it is that last 5% of practice that makes all the difference. There is a bit more to this. Don’t believe people who say too much practice leads to a formulaic or uninspiring delivery – exactly the opposite is typically true. When you know what is coming next in your talk you can lead the audience from one slide to the next without having to look at the screen constantly. This puts the audience at ease. Practice with friends, practice by yourself in your living room. Practice in the shower. Practice.</p>
<p>I have organized the rest of this into 5 parts and I will post them all here in series. Part I: The art of preparing the talk (9 commandments for building a truly great research seminar). Part II. The art of giving the talk (12 tips focused on the delivery of a great talk) Part III. A bundle of tips for making clear slides. Part IV. A quick hit list to check if you are truly ready to give you talk. And part V. A small number of resources. I will post these in separate posts and I am hoping for comments on ALL of these, so I can tighten this up even more over time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
			<wfw:commentRss>http://tewksburylab.org/blog/2012/09/collected-wisdom-on-job-talks-introduction/feed/</wfw:commentRss>
		<slash:comments>26</slash:comments>
		</item>
	</channel>
</rss>
